Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:18:27 +0100 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Though, and you hinted at
> it, I suspect in these cultures (probably without exception??) that another
> woman would take over feeding the baby.
> Surely, though they would have a 5% infertility rate - and that hasn't made
> a big impact on human population growth.
>
> Just totally unsubstantiated musings from
> Denise
This makes me muse further: what if indeed all these babies would be nursed by
other wonen (which indeed will probably be the case), then the birth-mother
would become pregnant sooner, have more babies alltogether, more babies alive
(?), so *more* chances of passing on the genes that count for lactation
insufficiency on to their offspring? Or do I miss something? Or is primairy
lactation insufficiency not inherited but merely a bad-luck variation? Just
wondering.
Gonneke van Veldhuizen, IBCLC, Maaseik, Belgium
http://www.users.skynet.be/eurolac
[log in to unmask]
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|