Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LACTNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LACTNET Home LACTNET Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Proportional Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
foremilk/hindmilk imbalance?
From:
Diane Wiessinger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 10 Feb 2008 20:17:23 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Susan questioned whether there's there's such a thing as a foremilk/hindmilk imbalance.  Here's my image of it, based initially on an ILCA session by Michael Woolridge maybe 15 years ago, with additions pieced together rom this and that:

Michael showed us the varying fat levels within a feed, from milk siphoned off as the feed progressed - a series of vials each with a thicker and thicker layer of cream.  A clear increase in fat over time during a feed.  But he also studied women in, um, somewhere in Asia I think, who nursed without restriction.  They would have no such variation in fat, he said, because they nursed frequently.

Why would that make a difference?  I picture the fat in our milk as sticking to the alveoli, just as cream might stick to a sponge (and I don't remember who I got this from).  Squeeze the sponge lightly and the lower fat milk runs out.  Keep squeezing, and the more reluctant fat eventually gets squeezed out as well.  Ah, but then the baby stops!  There's higher fat milk that's left kind of swirling around just inside the nipple, with nowhere left to go but back up into the ducts (a matter of gravity I suppose?) as the milk begins to separate again.  Give it enough time, and it retreats high enough into the breast that it has to be pulled down at the next feed after a considerable amount of foremilk has been swallowed.  Ah, but if the baby starts to nurse again fairly soon after having stopped, that swirling-around-inside milk hasn't had time to separate.  The fat content pretty much picks up where it left off - fairly high and fairly uniform throughout the feed.  That foremilk-hindmilk pattern that Michael illustrated so well is simply an artifact of artificially-stretched feedings.

At least that's the image I have in my mind.

Diane Wiessinger, MS, IBCLC  Ithaca, NY  USA
www.wiessinger.baka.com

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV