BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Sep 1999 11:03:58 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
John and Angie Partin wrote:in part
 propagated by the chemical
> companies, and their huge lobbying budgets, in order to maximize profit. An
> example of their techniques was when the Apistan strip was changed so that
> it wouldn't last as long or work as good.

Could you elaborate. Never heard this.
Are you talking about MiteACure or whatever it was called,
compared to Apistan? If so, then there is much more to the story
than bad chemical companies. Got to include bad beekeepers.
Bill T
Bath, ME

ATOM RSS1 RSS2