BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Sat, 15 Oct 2005 22:36:31 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
<010001c5d1a1$6ef05070$b77ba8c0@Nemo>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From:
Dee Lusby <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Dave and Allen:
 This study showed that for a body size shift of 10% there
was only a 1% change in the diameter of the tracheal
orifice.

Reply:
 Dave you say the measurements were linear which I perceive
then across the back of the thorax, wing side to wing side,
to match the inside diameter of the cell born in. Please
correct me if I am wrong here. Then which direction was the
orifice linear measured across the opening, since it would
seem either side to side, or top to bottom, etc would be
expanded? Also may I ask on what named bee this was done
upon?

Respectfully submitted,

Dee A. Lusby
Small Cell Commercial Beekeeper
Moyza, Arizona
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/organicbeekeepers/




__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2