BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Kerry Clark 784-2225 <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Dec 1992 08:18:00 -0800
Reply-To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Ramirez and Marin-R. tried something relevant. In Amer Bee J Vol 129 (12) Dec
1989 p 821 there is a summary of a comparison of royal jelly, distilled water
and cola as Q-cell "primers" (there was apparently a story going around, of cola
being beneficial). They report no statistical differences in quality of queens,
but report a difference in percentage of queens produced (royal jelly better
than dist water better than cola). All the values for emergence are low (57 %,
46 %, 26 %). Discussion at the meeting as I recall, indicated that reduction of
drying was the most important function of priming. If humidity was high and time
out of the colony short, priming was considered not necessary.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2