BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Adam Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Oct 2015 06:31:28 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines)
Randy/Peter, any thought on why the neonic studies with negative results are so often done with canola/rape?  Is the fact that this crop provides excellent nutrition/forage masking any effects of the neonics?  The old adage that a good flow fixes all? Certainly in this country the neonics industry funded studies have nearly all been done with canola, despite it be the areas with corn and soy beans that have greatest losses attributed to neonics.

Adam
Barrie,Ontario

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2