BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Sun, 18 Oct 2015 06:31:28 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Neonicotinoids and honey bee health
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Adam Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines) 
Randy/Peter, any thought on why the neonic studies with negative results are so often done with canola/rape?  Is the fact that this crop provides excellent nutrition/forage masking any effects of the neonics?  The old adage that a good flow fixes all? Certainly in this country the neonics industry funded studies have nearly all been done with canola, despite it be the areas with corn and soy beans that have greatest losses attributed to neonics.

Adam
Barrie,Ontario

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2