LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Rachel Myr <[log in to unmask]>
Thu, 27 Feb 2014 00:00:48 +0100
text/plain (29 lines)
Laura, I agree that this baby should not have his intake restricted any
longer. For four months he was unable to feed effectively, and he was
really deprived. He still needs to catch up.

I am curious about how it happened that he could go for four months with
such glaring problems.  A baby who is growing very very slowly, with
anatomical barriers to effective feeding might have been vigorously
attempting to get someone to feed him more, not sleeping through the night
and accepting 5-6 feeds daily.  You say the mother has worked very hard to
keep him on just her milk.  Did it take four months for her to get someone
to look at the baby and discover he was way undernourished?  Or was she
being advised by someone who thought it was normal for a newborn to be
content with 5-6 feeds, and to sleep all night? Not sure which is worse,
really.

Rachel Myr
Kristiansand, Norway

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2