LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 21 Jun 1998 22:43:03 -0800
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
Comments:
To: Margery Wilson <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
>Correct me if I am wrong, but I think US is only useful for
>diagnostics, not for routine screening? My patient is
>concerned about having a screening. She hasn't located any
>lumps.

I know it's usually only used for diagnostic, but is that because it
can't detect smaller lumps, or simply because it takes more time than
x-ray?  I don't know -- it's not my area of expertise at all -- but
if it's the latter, could an exception be made?  I'm just groping
here:  I hate the idea of squashing working breasts for a
mammogram...

Jennifer Landels, BA, CE
Vancouver BC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2