LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Patrica Young <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 07:14:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Pearl, why not go to the paper and find out the source of the column and
then to  the person who wrote the column.  Maybe there is a new article out
that we need to  know about.

Lucas's 1994 article starts out with almost that exact sentence.   They
compared formula, own mother's milk and milk bank milk.  Milk bank milk
(drip milk) was deficient in calories, but babies still showed same
superior intelligence advantages.  So they push for fortifying  milk bank
milk for premies if can't get mother's own milk.  Either are pref to
formula for neuro dev.  Sincerely, Pat in SNJ

ATOM RSS1 RSS2