HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:00:26 -0500
Content-Type:
MULTIPART/ALTERNATIVE
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (825 bytes) , text/html (908 bytes)
Archaeologists continue to misuse the term "mitigation." Environmental law
clearly defines the term as a program to reduce adverse effects to an
insignificant level. Government decision-makers typically direct contractors
to examine a wide range of potential mitigation methods, including adoption
of alternate construction sites, alternate transportation routes, site
capping, dedicated open space, private acquisition of the property, fencing,
dontating the property to a third party, or conducting a meaningful
scientific investigation following a research design. Since archaeologists
are at the bottom of the food chain, they often think digging is the only
form of mitigation. Of course, there is a bit of conflict of interest in that
they do not make money if the other mitigation alternatives were adopted.

Ron May
Legacy 106, Inc.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2