HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Sun, 3 Nov 2013 10:10:16 -0700
MIME-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Subject:
From:
Matt Munro <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-disposition:
inline
Content-transfer-encoding:
quoted-printable
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 lines)
 Hello everyone,

I'm looking for a reference that speaks about the fact that English-produced pottery designs were not subject to copyright prior to, what I seem to remember, the Copyright of Design Act of 1842. I honestly don't know much about the topic, but it's obviously a great way to explain why vessels from many manufacturers in certain periods can have the exact same (or very, very similar) design. I think Willow pattern is the immediate example that comes to mind. I'm sure this topic has been covered before, so any help would be most appreciated!

- Matt Munro

ATOM RSS1 RSS2