HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
geoff carver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 14 Feb 2000 20:48:58 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
David Babson schrieb:
> Could it be a Roman figurine head imported by a 16th-20th century
> collector, and lost?  Could it (if small enough) be something brought to
> Mexico in mud ballast from a Spanish/Mediterranean port, like the Roman
> coins and ancient British pottery found in the James River, Va. estuary
> (discussed, to the best of my recollection, in Noel-Hume's
> <italic>Historical Archaeology</italic>)?  Again, the German article
> seems to be trying for sensation and, to the best of my limited abilities
> at reading the language, does not mention these more mundane, but much
> more explicable, possiblities.
>
the german article is an excerpt from something in New Scientist - which was
equally vague and sensationalistic -

geoff carver
http://home.t-online.de/home/gcarver/
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2