HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Denis Gojak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:33:18 +1100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (124 lines)
The link at the end of my reply to Bob fell into the ether.  It is:
https://secretvisitors.wordpress.com/2011/01/26/ptolemy-iv-coin-found-in-queensland-part-1/
Denis
 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
Denis Gojak
PO Box 457Newtown NSW 2042Australia
e   [log in to unmask]  0400 474 405
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

----- Original Message -----
From: "HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY" 
To:
Cc:
Sent:Tue, 13 Dec 2016 09:26:20 +1100
Subject:Re: please help identify this coin-pendant? Canaanite? Celtic?
Fake?

 Hi Bob
 I vote MODERN based on :
 *  No matches for any combination of coin / medal / cow / bull
search
 terms on Google Images.  This should have reasonable capture as coin
 motifs are carefully described.  I also tried the image
 match  feature, but all I got was everything that looked like a
 brown circle.  So, no readily apparent ancient analogues, but your
 student could learn a lot from going to a good well-illustrated
 ancient coin website and just scanning through the candidates for a
 few hours.  Consider it character-building.
 *  As you noted, surprisingly well-centred if it was a die-struck
 coin.  It looks very much as if cast, rather than struck.  This
 doesn't exclude it but ups the odds of an ancient / recent / modern
 crappy replica.
 *  Lack of wear.  The profile view shows the central elements to be
 proud of the rim.  There is no sign of rounding or general wear on
 the rim or any elevated parts of the design.  Again, not a
 deal-breaker, but makes you think cynical thoughts.
 *  Reverse face looks very characteristic of a cast piece.  Apart
 from the well-formed central circle - possibly struck later - the
 'writing' seems to lack consistent size or shapes and may be an
 artefact of casting.  You could get a better sense by doing a
rubbing
 or a pull using plasticene.
 *  I think you are right about the tiny marks on the rim that
 superficially resemble milling.
 There is a surprisingly large literature on Old World coins
discovered
 in the Americas.  Unfortunately most of it is uncritical
 pre-columbian migration junk.  I'd start with the article by Jerome
 Epstein on pre-Columbian coins in Current Anthropology [1980] and
 follow through with whoever has cited that.   You could also try as
 a guide for things to consider when this sort of stuff turns up
 announced.
  cheers
 Denis

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
 Denis Gojak
 PO Box 457Newtown NSW 2042Australia
 e   [log in to unmask]  0400 474 405
 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

 ----- Original Message -----
 From: "HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY" 
 To:
 Cc:
 Sent:Mon, 12 Dec 2016 14:36:54 -0600
 Subject:please help identify this coin-pendant? Canaanite? Celtic?
 Fake?

 Folks,

 The provenance of this item is little-known (belongs to an aspiring 
 anthropology student who asked my help to identify it; his only 
 information is that it was LIKELY "unearthed" along the Rio Grande in

 Texas several decades ago). I am hopeful that SOMEONE will recognize 
 this, or be able to at least provide a clue to its possible origin 
 (and/or authenticity).

 My guessing (so far ... and let me say I have absolutely NO expertise
 in 
 numismatics, and especially not even a smidgeon in the coinage of the

 Old World):

 The main elements on the obverse (the "gamboling" young bullock, the 
 seven circles or rings which MAY possibly be interpreted as "eyes,"
 and 
 the upthrust phallus-shaped tail of the bullock) may all be symbols 
 alluding to the Canaanite god Baal (as in the one referred to in the 
 Bible as a "golden calf"). If this is a genuine ancient bronze 
 "hammered" coin, it is amazingly [almost unbelievably so] "centered."
 It 
 has had a suspension-loop attached (soldered on) at a later date 
 (perhaps by a modern jeweler), which may also account for the tooling

 marks seen on a small portion of the edge (that at first glance
 appear 
 possibly to be the machined "reeding" of modern coins, but since it
 is 
 not continuous, may also be simply the marks made by the jaws of a
 vice 
 that gripped the item securely whilst the loop was attached) ... as
 well 
 as the gilding (which is mostly worn-off)?

 In any case, the /verso/ is not as well-preserved, but appears to
 have 
 some type of inscription in an alphabet that I do not recognize. Do
 you 
 recognize this as script?

 In your opinion, is this pendant made of a genuine ancient coin, or
 is 
 it a modern fake?

 Image here:

 http://skiles.net/golden-calf-coin-pendant.jpg



ATOM RSS1 RSS2