HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lu Ann De Cunzo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:23:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Ron and all,

I do certainly consider the military an institution, but for my current
project, I'm setting aside military sites other than military schools,
prisons, etc.  The literature on military archaeology is vast, and
others are much better prepared than I to do it justice!

Lu Ann De Cunzo

Ron May wrote:
>
> I am not sure if you would count military archaeology as social
> institutions, but if so, I have excavated an early 20th century U.S.
> Army site (CA-SDI-12000). The feature was a burned building and the
> entire contents scooped up from the original location around 1916-1918
> and dumped at a secondary location (where I was digging down toward an
> earlier 19th century whaling station and 18th century Spanish cannon
> battery). All the artifacts have been analyzed and most box
> inventoried, but none have been quantified for a report. We had both
> private residential, as well as institutional material in the deposit.
>
> Ron May
> Legacy 106, Inc.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2