Steve Schwartz ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

>...  Besides, Stravinsky didn't change because he wanted to be
>"progressive." Or at least that wasn't the main reason.  He changed
>because he felt he had worn out the style he was using.  He felt written
>out.  The adaptation of the serial technique in my opinion renewed him.

One might make similar remarks about late Copland.

Deryk Barker
[log in to unmask]