BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Sep 2013 19:07:12 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
>How does anyone separate the special circumstance of "brood capping" from
all the other types of wax product in the hive?  Or do they?  The
literature I've seen isn't clear on that.


Christina, we seem to be jumping between two subjects--penetration of
cappings in order to attempt to kill mites, and the persistence of miticide
residues in the hive matrices.  I was referring to what I thought was your
question about the first.

Old brood combs actually proportionally far less wax than new combs--they
are composed largely of old silk cocoons and meconium.  So the dynamics of
residues in the combs is likely complicated.

--
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2