BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Jan 2017 12:29:14 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Old combs vs new
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<005d01d26835$ee5f15d0$cb1d4170$@com>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=utf-8
From:
[log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
"  Foundationless drew compete combs 30% faster. Period.  The caveat is that they usually do not attach it well at the bottom,  so you lose space,  and its worthless in a radial extractor."
 
Don't put it in an extractor.  Cut comb sells for twice the price of honey in the jar.

Chris
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2