BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Glen van Niekerk <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 May 2004 04:03:56 -0400
Comments:
To: Paul Collett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Dear Paul,

I have noted at the end of your post you state A.m. capensis and
A.m. scutellata.Hmm....?!!!!!

NOW:

Are you sure you do not have A.m. capensis laying workers in your A.m.
scutellata Hives? AKA: Cape bee problem.

I run many A.m. scutellata hives and am very nervous when it comes to queen
rearing.....

I usually have a 30 to 40 % success rate, IF I am lucky!

Failure is usually attributed to a contamination of A.m. capensis laying
workers.

Sincerely,

Glen

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2