BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 25 Nov 2017 14:38:21 +0000
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Top vs bottom supering
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
"[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines) 
 

    On Saturday, November 25, 2017 7:11 AM, Robert Darrell <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
 

 On 24-Nov-17, at 7:59 PM, Geoff Manning wrote

I assume that Szabo used doubles in this work, but I don't see why it  
shouldn't apply to singles also.  A disadvantage of top supering is  
tracking on the combs below.

I understand the thinking,   but am 1000% positive the same rules do not apply to running singles. Swarming, supering, queen excluder use are are completly differnt in single over doubles.
Night and day differences.  

Charles

   

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2