BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Mon, 5 Jan 2015 00:11:02 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
> The difference between the days of Phillips and the past decade is stark, no matter how you slice it.

Interesting statement, unsupported by any information. I happen to be very familiar with Phillips' work and I don't agree at all. One hundred years ago, foulbrood was widespread and bees were being destroyed, often whole apiaries. Not only that, but Isle of Wight disease was wiping out bees in England. Losses were substantial. Beekeepers persevered.

Not too long ago, there was a teleconference in which Marla Spivak answered questions from the public. I asked if she thought the current bee problems were unprecedented, to which she replied "yes." I would have liked more information; I guess I posed the question wrongly. 

I have spent years looking into this matter and if someone asks me that question, the answer tends to be a lot more than one word. By and large, most people prefer the short answer. 

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2