HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ned Heite <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Feb 2000 09:10:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
In Delaware, privy pits were unusual until sometime in the nineteenth
century. We did a literature survey and found that only the elite sites
were equipped with pit privies until the nineteenth century. There are
several studies indicating that in Southern sites, even some
twentieth-century privies would overhang the chicken yard. Makes you lose
you taste for chicken, eh?

Out in the arid west, there would be even less incentive to dig a privy
pit. A soil chemistry survey should tell you if there was a surface privy
or a dungheap on a site.

The presence of much domestic trash on manured fields tends to support the
idea that farm domestic waste was recycled onto the fields.


  Celebrating an anniversary year:
  20 years of Archaeology and History

  Ned Heite            _(____)_
  Heite Consulting    /Baby '69|
  Camden       _===__/88" Land ||
  Delaware    | ____ Rover__   ||
  19934      [||/ .\_____/ .\__|
 _____________  \__/_____\__/____
  http://home.dmv.com/~eheite

ATOM RSS1 RSS2