D. Stephen Heersink wrote:

>While it's true that classical music can be enjoyed by those who have
>not been trained in "listening skills," there's no question that having
>been taught these skills in college greatly improved my ability to
>appreciate the art.  Classical music is not as readily accessible to the
>general population as is popular music, and that some training, self-taught
>or not, is almost always a prerequisite to its fullest enjoyment.

I don't really want to downplay the merit of "training", particularly since
I received a great deal of it as a youngster.  But, since the bulk of the
world's population veiws music as an enjoyable diversion from the rigors
of life, keying on this aspect of listening appreciation will only insure
a tiny classical audience.

When I'm talking to possible future classical fans, I stress the emotional
enjoyment, power, melody, etc.  - aspects which most humans lean toward.
I stay away from the logical, mathematical, and educational aspects -
these folks do not want to hear that; it just turns them off quickly.

Concerning the fullest enjoyment of classical music, I keep hearing that
"training" is a prerequisite to reach this level.  People don't care
about that, and even I am not sure what brings an individual to "fullest"
enjoyment.  Each of us needs to decide that for our own maximum benefit.

So, I don't really disagree with anything Stephen wrote.  I think it's
just a matter of emphasis and the particular audience involved.

Don Satz
[log in to unmask]