Me, too!! Thanx
John R. White
DEPT of Soc/Anth
Youngstown State Univ.
Youngstwon, OH 44555
Andrew Sewell wrote:
> I'd be happy to send you one - I'm going to try and scan it to PDF though,
> to save costs, as I have gotten more requests for it than expected!
> Regards,
> Andrew R. Sewell, MS, RPA
> Principal Investigator
> Historic/Industrial Archaeology
> Hardlines Design Company
> 4608 Indianola Avenue
> Columbus, Ohio 43214
> (614)-784-8733
> fax: (614)-784-9336
> www.hardlinesdesign.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Gaye
> Nayton
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 7:14 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 19th-Century Homesteads and CRM
>
> True. Can I have one too please : )
>
> Gaye Nayton
> 10 Central Ave
> Maylands
> Perth
> Western Australia 6051
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gary Vines" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Monday, 12 May 2003 7:35 AM
> Subject: Re: 19th-Century Homesteads and CRM
>
> Even we in Australia could benefit from such a pro forma, so Can I put my
> name down for one too please.
>
> Gary Vines
> Archaeologist
> -----------------------------
> Biosis Research Pty. Ltd.
> Natural and Cultural Heritage Consultants
> 322 Bay Street (PO Box 489)
> PORT MELBOURNE, 3207
>
> ph: (03) 9646 9499
> fax: (03) 9646 9242
> mobile: 0428 526 898
> mailto:[log in to unmask]
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Pfeiffer [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, 9 May 2003 11:13 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: 19th-Century Homesteads and CRM
>
> Since the Ozark National Forest, Like so many in the eastern United States,
> was created from formerly private lands, we have Homesteads ALL OVER THE
> PLACE. In conjunction with the Arkansas Archeological Survey, we have a
> developed a prototype form which can be filled out in the field by either a
> professional or Tech. The purpose is to give us enough information to
> allow us to determine National Register potential, research potential,
> interpretive potential, ect.
>
> As in 99 percent of all CRM work, our purpose is 106 compliance and NOT
> what research questions. Once we determine that a site has potential for
> any of these three categories, it goes into the semi-permanent "flag and
> avoid" category. Kind of a "death by benign neglect". We get to nominate
> a couple of site to the National Register every few years which keeps us
> Section 110 compliant. We finagle a Passport In Time (PIT) project every
> now and then when we have personnel to supervise the projects. With these
> level of excavations, we get enough real information to determine the
> research potential of a site.
>
> Anyone wishing an electronic copy of the form, just let me know.
>
> Smoke.
>
> Smoke (Michael A.) Pfeiffer, RPA
> Ozark-St. Francis National Forests
> 605 West Main Street
> Russellville, Arkansas 72801
> (479) 968-2354 Ext. 233
> e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>
> It is easier to get forgiveness than permission.
>
> Jessica White
> <[log in to unmask] To: [log in to unmask]
> NET> cc:
> Sent by: Subject: 19th-Century
> Homesteads and CRM
> HISTORICAL
> ARCHAEOLOGY
> <[log in to unmask]
> u>
>
> 05/08/2003 07:13
> PM
> Please respond
> to HISTORICAL
> ARCHAEOLOGY
>
> Hello!
>
> Does anyone have any references for work done with 19th-century homesteads
> in
> the context of CRM work? How does one determine if an artifact scatter (in
> this context) should be recommended for more work? What sort of research
> questions can one ask?
>
> Obviously, any help/advice is much appreciated! :)
>
> Thanks,
> Jessica
>
> *************************************************
> Jessica White
> Historical Archaeologist
> Glenn A. Black Lab of Archaeology
> Office of Cultural Resource Management
> Bloomington, Indiana
> *************************************************
|
