CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Steve Schwartz <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Jun 2000 07:22:09 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
   Antonin Dvorak
   String Quartets

* String Quartet No. 14 in Ab, op. 105
* String Quartet No. 12 in F, op. 96 "American"

Cleveland Quartet (Preucil, Salaff, Dunham, Katz)
Total time: 56:57
Telarc CD-80283

Summary for the Busy Executive: An okay American. A mostly-beautiful Ab.

I might as well forfeit all my credibility and admit that I prefer Dvorak's
string quartets to Brahms's - not all of them (some early examples
definitely show the composer feeling his way), but the mature ones. Dvorak
certainly has more of them to love, compared to Brahms's modest three. I
feel Dvorak's ease and Brahms's discomfort in the form. It may have
something to do with the fact that Dvorak was a string player and Brahms a
pianist. Schoenberg once pointed out that Brahms's string quartets lay
suspiciously well for a pair of hands on the piano.

A series of old Vox Boxes introduced me to Dvorak's chamber music and
immersed me in his string quartets. I'd call the performances sturdy,
rather than elegant or penetrating, and I kept on the lookout for other
accounts. A revelatory performance of the "American" by the Quartetto
Italiano on Philips bowled me over, and it's remained among my top five
Dvorak readings.  I never followed the Cleveland Quartet very closely while
it was active - definitely my loss. However, I saw William Preucil, as
concertmaster of the Cleveland Orchestra, do a Mozart violin solo and had
to pick my jaw up off the ground. Not only did it sound unbelievably rich
and Preucil phrase superbly, the physical act of playing was remarkable in
itself. It was as if the instrument floated in the air and Preucil touched
it only enough to hit the right note and move the bow across the strings.
In comparison, other violinists, even very good ones, seemed to haul about
a piece of lumber. So I decided to acquaint myself more fully with
Preucil's work.

The "American" quartet in F probably qualifies as Dvorak's best known,
perhaps because it's the only one with a subtitle. Of course, lively themes
and rhythms help. In any case, there's very little "American" about it,
aside from the fact that he composed it in Spillville, Iowa. In fact, its
idiom sounds similar to that of the String Quintet in Eb, which he composed
at roughly the same time and which doesn't get the same fuss. It starts off
with a syncopated, pentatonic theme, which shares a family look with the
opening to the "New World" symphony. Again, he finished the two works
within months of each other. One can even hear a similarity among the
second subject groups of the two works. The Cleveland plays with a big,
rich sound and beautiful intonation, and that's part of the trouble. They
have a rather restricted dynamic range, particularly toward the softer end.
It's beautiful but not especially subtle playing, short on atmosphere and
a bit soft on the attack (not particularly desirable for dance rhythms).
One may counter that Dvorak's music can take the bluff and hearty approach.
I don't necessarily disagree, but I find the Quartetto Italiano's lighter,
nervous excitement, building tension by keeping on the dynamic lid, a more
penetrating, multi-faceted account - amounting to a successful rethinking
of this composer.

The Ab quartet, Dvorak's last or second-last (depending on how you count),
is more introspective than the "American," and the Cleveland, to its
credit, responds to the difference. The interpretive subtlety missing
from their other performance comes through here. Again, the key seems to
be the refinement of the gradations of soft dynamic and their imaginative
application. This is evident throughout the emotionally complex first
movement and even in the scherzo, played by many quartets as a jolly
dance with a tender trio. Even in the bolder sections, the Cleveland
finds opportunities for softer, contrasting dynamics. Obviously, a lot
of planning has gone into this performance. In the slow movement, the
Cleveland seems to lose this fine focus just before the middle - or maybe
I do. The notes just lie there, like a heavy meal, rather than lead
anywhere. However, the group quickly recovers, finishing beautifully. The
final movement delivers some wonderful surprises: the opening transition
from the F major of the slow movement to the Ab of the finale is gorgeously
done, with intonation exciting in itself. Here and there, the rhythm
momentarily dulls a bit, but the players catch themselves and pull up their
socks. The climaxes blaze with the glory of the Mendelssohn Octet. You
almost can't believe only four guys are playing.

The recorded sound is a bit much, for my taste. For chamber music, I prefer
a slightly drier acoustic than what Telarc provides. Still, those who enjoy
a good wallow might not mind as much.

Steve Schwartz

ATOM RSS1 RSS2