BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:55:47 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Jerry Bromenshenk wrote:
>  We've 
> also seen tracheal mites in high levels in recovering hives (but these  mites 
> were not in the same hives before collapse).  
Got me confused on that one. How did they know they did not have 
tracheal before the collapse but suddenly had high levels afterward? It 
does  not make sense.

Tracheal mites tend to be the forgotten mites since everyone's bees are 
now immune to them. Only problem is we have many colonies in Maine that 
collapse from Tracheal and all are from hives that "do not have 
Tracheal", at least before the samples were sent in. I still think that 
many Varroa problems are actually Tracheal. It is just easier to see a 
Varroa mite on a drone pupa, than to pop off a head and look through a 
scope to find Tracheal.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2