BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Cryberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Dec 2015 00:19:10 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
"we should not be taking honey that the bees might need for
 themselves. And if they cannot produce enough to support
 themselves, then to supplement them with artificial feed is
 to select for inferior bees."

This is simply inane.  Bees are well proven to survive better on sugar than on honey when there is a difference.  You only select for inferior bees when you actually selectively breed.  No professional queen breeder is ever going to select against productivity.  As most back yard bee keepers increase by splits of hives on the verge of swarming or swarms they are strongly selectively breeding for swarming and probably nothing else in most cases.  This is doing far more damage to the gene pool than feeding sugar will ever do.  I will admit I have a prejudice against ever using swarm cells.  In my opinion swarm cells are only good for one thing.  Grubbing out with a dull knife and throwing away.

Dick



" Any discovery made by the human mind can be explained in its essentials to the curious learner."  Professor Benjamin Schumacher talking about teaching quantum mechanics to non scientists.   "For every complex problem there is a solution which is simple, neat and wrong."  H. L. Mencken

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2