BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 7 Feb 2004 08:22:14 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
There is a lot in the archives on supercedure and swarm queens.

There are differences in what you mean by supercedure and swarm queens
since there is controlled supercedure and swarms as well as "natural"
supercedure and swarms. Unless the method is defined, it is unlikely
that this discussion will go anywhere since we will not be talking about
the same thing.

For example, supercedure by splits in the spring is a good queen rearing
method. Supercedure by queen failure in the fall is a disaster here in
Maine. One is controlled, the other is not. I would take a natural swarm
queen in the spring over a natural supercedure queen in the fall and
vice versa.

A good friend of mine once got in a heated discussion over the
differences between the Psychology of Jung and Young. I think we are
moving in that direction.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2