> I do not think it fair, at least at this time, to name the product unless 
> it proves to be defective.

Well, you've already suggested that pollen supplement was to blame.  Given 
the way that some people read, this guess has already turned into fact and 
certainty in many minds, and now includes *all* supplements, since some lean 
that way anyhow.

Better that you name names and we promptly compare notes, test if necessary, 
and exonerate the product -- as I am sure we will -- than have this doubt 
over all.

> I do not think it fair, at least at this time, to name the product unless 
> it proves to be defective.

At this point, after making that suggestion I don't think it is fair not to.

If you are right, people need to know right now.

If you are wrong, people need to know right now. 

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---