BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Peter L. Borst" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Aug 2007 08:53:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
>worker cell size is uniform
>and averages 5.2 mm in width.
>
>Isn't that a contradiction in terms?

I already addressed this question. Of course the cell size varies. The
question is: how much? Seeley and Morse do not say, so I am assuming that
they didn't consider the variation to be significant, or they would have
included the deviation,-- just as they did in describing the thickness of
the brood comb. 

It boils down to *significant* differences. Plus or minus .1 mm would be
significant; .01 mm really wouldn't. Eva Crane lists the size for European
A. mellifera at 5.1 to 5.5 (a deviation of .2mm); Taber and Owens (1970)
observed 5.3mm in the USA; Eva Crane lists the size of scutellata at 4.7 to
4.9 (average 4.8mm)

Pete
 

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2