BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lloyd Spear <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:01:50 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Are we, as beekeepers, convinced that in order to keep queens banked the
surrounding bees must be queenless?  Has anyone tried otherwise?

I know one beekeeper who claims that the "queenless" part is in the old
wives tale category and it doesn't make a difference!  He says the workers
will feed banked queens just fine.  He does, however, suggest a double row
of wire separation as otherwise the workers may bite at the pads on the
bottom of the queen feet.

Any thoughts or experience?

Lloyd
Lloyd Spear, Owner of Ross Rounds, manufacturer of comb honey equipment
for beekeepers and Sundance pollen traps.
http://www.rossrounds.com
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2