BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Alyn W. Ashworth" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Jan 1997 13:07:34 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
In message <[log in to unmask]>, Dave Black <dave_black@tfbpl
c.demon.co.uk> writes
>In message <[log in to unmask]>, Phil Veldhuis
><[log in to unmask]> writes
>>If this list is _really_ a discussion of bee biology, then this should
>>be respected.
 
>I'd naively supposed
>that one 'chatted' in <sci.agriculture.beekeeping> and 'discussed' in
>BEE-L.
 
You've hit the nail on the proverbial head. Can we repectfully ask
chatters (and that's me, sometimes) to stick to
sci.agriculture.beekeeping. I know that discussions go off-subject very
often - in which case we should transfer to the appropriate place.
--
Alyn W. Ashworth
Lancashire & North-West Bee-Keepers' Association. UK.
(but I don't speak on their bee-half)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2