BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Stoops <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:15:02 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:Thus, their resistant bees (to varroa mite) actually may have been bees
selected to produce less brood and to be less able to
sustain mite population growth.  Consequently, they
also would have been less able to collect a surplus of
honey.

The study with which I'm associated doesn't use mite drops as a count criteria.  We actually take bee samples and do an actual count of mites per number of bees; i.e.  sample of 450 bees has a mite count of 15 mites and thus has a load level of 3 1/3 percent.

Mike  Located in lower Alabama


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2