BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Natural bee size... was, Feeding honey to bees
From:
Chris Slade <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:29:07 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
 
In a message dated 13/11/2006 04:25:47 GMT Standard Time,  
[log in to unmask] writes:

Pardon  me for butting in, but I think Dave was trying to convey a different  
message.  I think he was saying that for Amm the naturally built comb in  the 
beginning was around 5.5 mm, not that the bees had been  upsized.



What did Wildman have to say about UK cell size in the 1700s?
 
Chris

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2