BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
George Fielder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:22:11 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
In a message dated 2/21/2005 9:27:27 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> Mentioning that word - what about dates? Do they produce a honey crop - and
> if that is the case, when will I be able to
> label up such a pot without fear of being prosecuted under the fraudulent
> labeling policy of Canada as
> "Canada number 1".
>
>

Being a Beek since 1981, I learnt that that Canada No 1 means the contents
meet the No 1 grade as defined (and now patented) by the federal government.  If
the source of the honey is not Canadian (in this case) then a statement need
be included somewhere on the labelling (not necessarily on the front page)
where the honey was produced.  The Beek is now technically a packer as is anyone
using honey that their organisation did not themselves produce.
george

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2