BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dee Lusby <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:46:01 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Hi to all on BEE-L

Peter Borst wrote:
By the way, there is nothing confusing in stating that in
Africa smaller cells and smaller bees in do not reduce
mites, which seems to cast doubt on this being a main
factor.

There is nothing confusing in stating that the Lusbys have
so many variables going on that no one (not even them) can
say what is the main factor in their reduction of mite
counts.

Reply:
What we are doing that can be read by anyone can be found
at:

http://www.beesource.com/pov/lusby/abjnov1989.htm

http://www.beesource.com/pov/lusby/apiacta1992.htm

http://www.beesource.com/pov/lusby/apiacta1995.htm

It is based on honeybee field management on a "wholebee
concept" and not doing field management by soundbites in
bits and pieces.

Further, the bees are always here to come and see for
yourself, and take wax samples for residues, and
varroa/trachael count samples, and/or any secondary disease
sampling also.

Sincerely,

Dee A. Lusby



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2