BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Rowbottom <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:34:59 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
In message <[log in to unmask]>, Pav
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>Hi All
>
>I am hearing claims here that Bayvarol causes less residues in beeswax than
>Apistan,
>and further, that it is okay for use during the honey flow.
>
>Can anyone tell me whether there truly ARE less residues with Bayvarol, given
>that both
>are synthetic pyrethroids, and if so, what makes the difference?
>
>-Pav, sceptical...

There is a great deal less (in terms of milligrams per treatment) of the
active pyrethroid in Bayvarol than in Apistan.  This is primarily, as I
understand it, because the Flumethrin in Bayvarol is considerably more
active than the fluvalinate in Apistan.  It may follow from this that
permissible limits are lower for flumethrin than for fluvalinate?

Regards
--
Mike Rowbottom



HARROGATE
North Yorkshire
UK

ATOM RSS1 RSS2