BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Roger White <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 20:59:40 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Roger White 
To: [log in to unmask] 
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 8:56 PM
Subject: Raising queens


I thought that I would give my own opinion on the subject.  I always regard supersedure queens as inferior.  They are always raised from a failing/old mother and as such cannot be expected to have the physical or genetic qualities of a queen in her prime that is used to produce daughters.  As breeder queens go, the difference between the daughters raised from a two and three year old breeder queen are very obvious.  The daughters of three year olds are always of a lower qualtiy than the two year olds.  In human terms it is like expecting a quality baby from a fifty year old woman - sometimes it is ok, but sometimes not!  I always replace supersedure and swarm queens with a good quality queen that I've bred myself and mated it to selected drones in a mating station - they have no equal from a human beekeeping point of view.  By this I mean that they should have all the characteristics I need to produce a decent crop of honey with little extra input from me.
Best regards
Roger White
Superbee Cyprus.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2