BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
queenbee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:37:40 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
> I skipped through the report from Craig Davis but did not find any
> reference to Jarrah honey, as I hoped. The report was prepared mid 2002 
> and the stream of news on Jarrah honey dates from 2004-2005 but still, 
> with the report published late 2005 a mention of Jarrah honey
> would in my eyes have suited well.

Jarrah is the "new kid on the block".  It certainly has very high peroxide 
activity.  The report would not have mentioned jarrah as the author did not 
do the work on it as I know the story.  The work on jarrah was by another 
author as I recall.

Trevor Weatherhead
AUSTRALIA
Coming to Apimondia in Australia in 2007? 

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2