BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Allen Dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Mar 2002 08:00:36 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
> Just wondering what some of you guys found out this past year concerning
the
> Harbo queens. Seems to me that, some of them I have are way behind on
brood
> and overall bee numbers this spring.

If we are going to compare queens, I think we need to name the supplier, the
quality of queen purchased, and when it was purchased.  The quality of the
queen rearing and the season can affect the quality of the resultant stock
as much or more than the strain of bee.

Moreover, pure Harbo breeders *will* have low brood rearing levels.  That is
a given.  Harbo says so himself.

Harbo recommends no more than 75% of his Harbo SMR blood in queens used to
head production hives.

Pure Harbo stock is sold only for the purpose of raising hybrid daughters.
Also Artificially Inseminated queens often do not perform as well or as long
as naturally mated queens.

We need to also consider that Harbo stock is *not* selected for other
desirable traits, only SMR.

allen
http://www.internode.net/honeybee/diary/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2