BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tom Martin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:47:29 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
------------------------------------------


>The differences in drone populations in the TBH's compared to
>Langstroths was quite noticeable - I'd estimate 3 times that >found in
a
>Langstroth on foundation.

 What is the history of the packages?

 Did you requeen?



>Some wonderings aloud:

>1) Does anyone know if any breeders have focused on lowering >drone
>percentages (and can it be done by breeding)?


In my observations drone number levels and queen viability are closely
related. Disease and drone raising increase when a queen nears the end
of her useful life. This would be a natural reaction to prepare for
swarming.
  I believe we will find a link between queen viability, honey
production, and disease suppression in a hive. One result of a nonviable
queen in a hive isolated from mites, foulbrood, and such is disappearing
disease. The specific link I am investigating may not be the key.
However there is something linking queen viability and hive performance
which cannot be ignored.
  Tom
  Shippensburg, Pa

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2