BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 10:19:22 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
I was somewhat amused to read a recent paper in the Journal of Apicultural
Research which compared the relative reliability of four methods of
assessing defensiveness.
To summarise, the methods were:
1. Rate them on the basis of nervousness, flying off the comb, hitting your
veil and stinging.
2. Wave a flag (black, suede pouch) over the broodnest.
3. Wave a flag at them in a perspex box (the mind boggles!).
4. Apply alarm pheromone to the entrance and see how many bees come out to
see what is going on.

...and the winner was - No 1!  Proving, I think, what we all knew already:
if your bees attack you, then if it safe to say that they are defensive.

Peter Edwards (getting more cynical as each day passes)
[log in to unmask]
www.stratford-upon-avon.freeserve.co.uk/

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2