BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Burgess <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
John Burgess <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:28:50 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Borst"


> Recently I said:
> some of the treatments mentioned on this list: they're illegal.
>
> Mike Rowbottom countered:
> Legal/illegal varies from Country to Country; I believe this is an
> International list, so subscribers, please treat scattergun comments
> on 'legality' with care.
>
> Response:
> I wonder what people think when they're using a treatment that's
> legal in their country and banned elsewhere. Does that mean it's safe
> in their country and not in others? >

There is an important difference between "banned" and "not approved".

John Burgess, Editor Gwenynwyr Cymru - The Welsh Beekeeper

ATOM RSS1 RSS2