BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 21:00:25 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Roger White wrote:
'I thought that I would give my own opinion on the subject.  I always regard
supersedure queens as inferior.  They are always raised from a failing/old
mother and as such cannot be expected to have the physical or genetic
qualities of a queen in her prime that is used to produce daughters.'

Not sure that I can agree with this.
Surely the genetic characteristics will not change with age and the physical
quality of the queen is down to the conditions under which she is raised,
i.e. adequate nurse bees, good pollen supply etc.  I cannot see that the age
of the queen is very relevant - or am I missing something?

Peter Edwards
[log in to unmask]
www.stratford-upon-avon.freeserve.co.uk/

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2