BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Kilty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Nov 2000 23:31:28 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
In message <[log in to unmask]>, Robert Mann
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>>The result is a more stable, higher-solid product which increases the
>>efficency of the ripening process.

>The sucrose molecule is split, by adding a water molecule's constituent 3
>atoms (a process called hydrolysis), to produce one molecule of glucose and
>one of fructose.

>        I can make little of the final sentence in the quote.  Sucrose is
>not inherently unstable under the conditions of ripening; and 'the
>efficiency of the ripening process' means little to me; it sounds as if
>written by an economist.
I wonder if the original statement referred to the removal of one
molecule of water per molecule of sucrose which means less for the bees
to remove by evaporation.
--
James Kilty

ATOM RSS1 RSS2