BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karen Oland <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:37:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
So, is the "flux" -- agricultural pesticide use? or toxic nectar?
or pesticides used by beekeepers?

or perhaps, the ancient meaning of general sickness unknown?

One of the first seems likely from your reply (although I will
admit, I assumed the latter upon reading your post), but I am
still unclear as to what should be abated.

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Mann

The inquiry implies I may have assumed too much about how widely the term
'flux', as used by physicists, is understood.  It is a flow per unit area.
I was using the term loosely.  I meant a flow of toxic substance impinging
on bees.  'Toxic dosing' would have done.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2