BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Sucrose Octanoate
From:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 3 Nov 2003 02:15:12 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
> Jamie Strange, from WSU, doing a careful study, gave 65% as verified
> by alcohol wash, according to what I heard at BCHPA.

Ooops.    Sorry.  He verified by using sticky boards during the application
and new sticky boards, plus coumaphos drop after.  He also repeated the test
over a period of time.  Several years, if I remember correctly.

I remembered these details immediately after sending the post quoted above.

I must confess that I lost interest somewhat and quit taking notes when I
learned how ineffective SOE appeared to be.

allen
http://www.honeybeeworld.com

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2