BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Julian O'Dea <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:36:01 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
One of the problems with the debate about bee "language" is
that the simple fact of the honeybees' dancing seems to
dazzle people.  The whole thing makes for such a charming
story.

After reading Adrian Wenner's "Anatomy of a Controversy"
book, I asked myself - "Well, if bees don't dance to convey
location information to other bees, why do they dance?"

I think Professor Wenner and Dr Rosin are probably correct
- bees don't dance to convey location information. Odour
is the key. But their explanations for why the bees nevertheless
dance did not satisfy me.  That is why I published this:

http://naturalscience.com/ns/articles/01-13/ns_jdo.html

On the matter of the value of the Internet in opening up
this debate, and the difficulties in getting anti-language
papers published, I could add that I wrote a follow-up to
the above paper. I was unable to get this published by the
same journal.  The reasons given did not seem entirely
satisfactory to me.  I suspect that there is a level of
censorship of anti-dance language thinking.  The dance
"language" has become a "sacred cow" (excuse the mixed
metaphors) to which people are emotionally attached.


Julian O'Dea
Canberra, Australia

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2