BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:02:06 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
--- Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Small cell *regression* has been a nightmare for
> many to gain what?

I gained freedom from treatments, I gained the ability
to harvest from the supers and broodnest without fear
of harming my family and friends with contaminates, I
gained freedom from buying fancy queens when my first
hygienic test of 10 small cell feral colonies revealed
6 out of 10 were hygienic, I gained a 90% winter
survival success, and the part I love most is I gained
the ability to look my customer in the eye and say
with honesty that my product is safe.

> Stories abound all over the bee lists of small cell
> failures!

How do you know that these weren't' beekeeper
failures? ;>)
More research needs to be done in this area!

I have learned that beekeepers will blame the queens,
bees, methodry, environment, winter condensation,
everything but themselves.

Dick Allen & I
> have stepped forward to say our research was a
> failure and waste of time!

I'm not sure that Allen had a chance to research small
cell,  he was still regressing and stabilizing.

> How about a few others giving their findings?

I'm finding success!  Anyone in PA, come out and visit!

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2