BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Brian Fredericksen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 20:32:10 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:33:05 -0800, Mike Stoops <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

 But in what I've read in the commentaries here I can't recall anyone saying "all" the collapsed 
colonies that were called CCD affected had Nosema Ceranae.
>
>Mike in LA


Without getting too convoluted in who said what when please refer to: 

http://bee-quick.com/reprints/practical.pdf

Mr Fisher references  the paper “A Metagenomic Survey of Microbes 
in Honey Bee Colony Collapse Disorder” (“Science”, 09/06/07)

and says

" Although the authors dismissed Nosema as a possible correlating factor for CCD, 
their tests found Nosema to be surprisingly common.  Nearly universal.  Every 
apiary affected by CCD was found to have Nosema, and 90% of them had both 
types of Nosema at the same time.  Even among apiaries said to be “free of 
CCD”, 92% of them were found to have Nosema ceranae, and 47% of them had 
Nosema apis. " 
  
                          Apiaries                       Apiaries 
                          With CCD                 Free Of CCD 
Nosema apis   90%                         47.6% 
Nosema ceranae 100%                  92.1% 

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2